The erosion control programme you can build without a project budget

Image generated using AI

Catchment groups are stretched. Funding is tight, coordinators are busy, and the list of things that need doing is always longer than the resources to do them. So how are a handful of groups quietly building erosion control programmes that don't depend on a government fund or a council initiative to get started?

From facilitation to foresight

Most catchment groups think of themselves as connectors - bringing farmers together, facilitating conversations, keeping the lights on. That's true, and it's valuable. But the enabling role can be broader than that.

A coordinator trained on the right tools can do something that used to require a paid consultant or a funded project: the discovery layer. Desktop assessments of individual farms. Identifying which properties have the highest concentration of highly erodible land. Checking that any future planting will be ETS-registerable before a single pole goes in the ground.

This kind of work is now accessible on operational funding alone. Five years ago, the capability barrier was real - you needed specialist expertise, a project budget, or a council-funded initiative to do this kind of spatial analysis at farm level. Technology has changed that. The tools now exist to give a coordinator - someone local, someone trusted - the ability to do what used to require bringing in outside help.

The constraint is no longer the tools. It's whether the group decides this is worth doing.

The resources already around you

Technology is one part of the picture. The other is knowing who to call.

Regional councils hold a lot of knowledge about the land in their regions. Some of it is in databases and GIS layers - technically accessible, but only useful if you know what you're looking for and how to apply it. Some of it lives in people - scientists and advisors who've spent careers in a region, who know which slopes fail in a wet year and which species actually take on the clay face that catches every north-westerly. Both are available to a coordinator who knows who to call and what to ask.

Councils can't always commit to running structured programmes. But the people with the knowledge are still there, and in many cases actively looking for ways to contribute within the constraints they're operating under. A catchment group that decides to lead gives them exactly that opportunity.

The foresight that changes everything

A coordinator's value can be in identifying and protecting opportunity.

Consider what happens when a farmer plants poplars for erosion control without anyone checking the details upfront. It happens more than you'd think. A Tararua-based catchment group working through exactly this challenge found a consistent pattern among their farmers:

• One had planted poplars just over their boundary onto public land. Not registerable.
  

• Another had planted a good-sized area, but the shape of the planting was too narrow to meet the minimum width requirement for ETS registration.
  

• A third had planted 0.9 hectares. A few more poles and they'd have cleared the one-hectare threshold. They didn't know.
  

• A fourth had spaced their poles slightly too far apart, and didn't meet the 30% canopy cover requirement at maturity.
  

None of these farmers did anything wrong. They planted trees to hold their slopes together, which is exactly the right instinct. They just didn't know what they didn't know. And by the time anyone looked close enough to spot it, the poles were already in the ground.

A coordinator running a desktop assessment before planting catches all four of those issues - not after the fact, but before a single pole goes in. It means the options stay open - for whenever the farmer is ready to think about them.

A question of priorities

The most common objection we hear is that coordinator time is finite, and catchment groups are stretched. That's fair.

But is it worth making time for?

A coordinator who can identify erosion planting that qualifies for the ETS across even a handful of farms is delivering considerable value - the kind of work that isn't accessible to most groups when budgets are tight and funding is uncertain.

The groups who are moving on this aren't doing it because they have more resources than anyone else. They've just decided it's worth doing.

Getting started

If your group is thinking about what a more deliberate erosion control workstream could look like, get in touch. We work with catchment groups across New Zealand to build exactly this kind of capability.

Talk to our team > https://www.carboncrop.com/catchment-group-programme